Why neoliberal economic model, the market declined
It is unlikely that some economists critique the neoliberal model of Peru is considered a rejection of the market, and those critics of this model to be branded as enemies of the market. This inability to reason is also revealed when they hear talk of nationalizing the economy and nationalizing strategic activities, ie put them in the service of national interest. The purpose of this paper is to invite well-intentioned reader to participate in a debate that goes beyond the dichotomous thinking and deploying state-Market curiosity to study development issues.
The neoliberal economic model is denationalizing
the neoliberal model applied to Peru denationalizing develops an economic circuit. Suffice to note that the fall in the growth rate of 9.8% in 2008 to 0.9% in 2009, reveals the disconnection of our economy with their domestic markets or a strong dependence on what happens in the international market. This is history, but does not seem enough. Denationalizing Why?
First, the neoliberal version of the export model applied here (which is different from the export version of the Asian countries), not considering the development of domestic markets. Leave aside the factors of domestic demand and emphasizes the minimalist state, consistent with the neoclassical theory of international trade and economic growth. For this theory the self-regulating market is efficient, market distortions are caused by government intervention and trade because countries have different specializations to benefit from trade if each produces and sells what he can do relatively better.
Second, because, unlike what happened in the Asian countries, directs the development outside the domestic markets, instead creating enclaves with no links to the domestic economy and does not take into account the interests of national community Sierra and the jungle region.
Third, because of its focus on exports, given the conditions of that part, generates free riding behavior in international competition by eliminating workers’ rights, maintenance of stagnant real wages, the imposition of tax stability contracts infringe national sovereignty, and neglect of the environmental costs of primary resource exploitation (think Coacher reader, Reequip, in Mamas, Pure, in Bangui, Amazons, or only in La Royal, Cerro de Pasco). Consider also, the reader, in non-traditional exports which base their competitiveness on cheap labor and low skills.
Finally, because it favors foreign investment in the primary activity exporters selling in foreign markets, rather than promote growth in domestic demand in line with increased production diversified supply. The neo-liberal export model does not allow internally exploit the fruits of technical progress or increases in productivity over the national interest.
No Comments to “Why neoliberal economic model, the market declined”